PACE Act Small Group Update For Employers

President Obama has signed into law the Protecting Affordable Coverage for Employees (PACE) Act. The House of Representatives passed H.R. 1624 on September 28 through voice vote and the Senate, through unanimous consent, passed the legislation on October 1.

The PACE Act repeals the mandated small-group expansion from groups of up to 50 employees to groups of up to 100 employees that was to go in to effect on January 1, 2016. This law gives states the flexibility to determine the size of their small-group market instead of being forced into the national standard. HR Knowledge has long been concerned that the combination of the new compliance requirements and the regulations for the new group size would cause dramatic change to the insurance policies of medium-sized employers, and we have continued to advocate for the enactment of the PACE Act to prevent this type of market disruption.

As stated above, the PACE Act defines small groups as those with up to 50 full-time equivalents; however, states now have the ability to set their own definition of small group as long as the definition is no less than 50 and no more than 100.

The PACE Act does not delay the ACA’s employer mandate or its reporting requirements.  However, the Act has broad bipartisan support and perhaps signals that there may be more bipartisan adjustments to the ACA in the future.  Presidential candidates on both sides have signaled that they would explore repealing the ACA’s excise tax on high-cost health plans (the Cadillac tax) as well as the ACA’s 2.3% tax on medical device manufacturers.

Organizational Behavior: Key to Future Success for Leaders

“Gallup researchers, who base the Employee Engagement Index on a survey of nearly 42,000 randomly selected adults, estimate that disengaged workers cost US businesses as much as “$350 billion a year.”  Organizational Behavior and understanding how to integrate these practices in to business are critical to the success of leaders of the future.  Job security, careful hiring practices, self-managed teams, generous pay for performance, training, teamwork and trust-building skills provide the stanchions for stability and success.

Organizational behavior deals with how people act and react in organizations of all kinds.  Relative to your interpersonal effectiveness:  being a team player, negotiating for a win-win, change management, managing conflict, communicating and influencing, trust building, and leading others ultimately make you a success as a leaders.  Many technical employees (accountants, IT resources etc.) challenge the need to study organizational behavior as they don’t see the relevance to their current positions.  I would argue that eventually you may start out with a narrow specialty, but eventually your success in a company will be your ability to lead.  Your people skills, your emotional intelligence can make or break your career.

Today we have a team-oriented and globalized workplace,  your teamwork, cross-cultural, communication, conflict handling and your powers of persuasion will be tested.  Those who past the test will be those that thrive in organizations.

There are 4 critical activities to be aware of as you contemplate your place in your organization and your long-term goals.

  1. The human relations movement
  2. The quality movement
  3. The Internet and social media revolution
  4. The age of human and social capital

Growth depends on the sharing of valuable knowledge.  What good are bright employees who do not network, teach, inspire and motivate?”

If you are interested in hearing more about organizational behavior, please contact us.  We will be happy to customize a program for you or for members of your leadership team.   My thanks to Robert Krieitner and Angelo Kinicki for their sage and well written text entitled Organizational Behavior for the content of this article.

Social Media Styles Compliments of author Randy Emelo

I belong to many networks of consultants from around the United States,  author Randy Emelo provides a thought provoking article that deals with communication via social media.  I hope you find this as interesting as I did!

“We’ve all been there, sitting in a meeting listening to someone speak, when the person asks a question of the group. Cue cricket sounds. No one wants to speak up, and everyone is waiting for someone else to take action.

Now imagine that happening in a social learning environment when people only interact via technology. One colleague refers to this as playing “social chicken.” The long delays (or outright non-responses) between interactions can cause frustration and lead people to check out of the social learning environment never to return.

Working and learning together virtually takes much more intentional collaboration from all participants. We can begin to address the problem of “social chicken” by attempting to understand who our collaborators are and what type of collaboration style they tend to use.

Most of us have a preferred way of collaborating with others that shapes the way we are viewed by our colleagues. In the virtual social learning environment, four distinct styles or modes of collaboration exist that can greatly impact the way a virtual group works and learns together to accomplish their goals. These four collaboration styles are: Conformist, Expert, Co-Creator, and Community Builder.

CONFORMISTS observe accepted procedures and protocols in an attempt to avoid inner and outer conflict. They are very cooperative and nice toward others, but show very little concern about organizational issues beyond their immediate work team. The group member collaborating in this style does not seek out feedback, avoids negativity, and cannot openly disagree.

EXPERTS are interested in solving problems and are often critical of self and others. They tend to be dogmatic in their judgements, meaning they are assertive when stating matters of opinion. They rely on logic and intellectually determined objectivity to guide their actions. The group member collaborating in this style will work independently to discover the one provable right answer, trust only his/her own judgements, and defer to the authority of his/her chosen craft masters to the exclusion of other social learning collaborators.

CO-CREATORS are initiators of results-oriented action. They hold a vivid and inspiring vision of the future and work well with others to accomplish pre-determined goals. They genuinely care about gaining mutuality with others and seek to cultivate their relationships with coworkers. The group member collaborating in this style seeks consensus, teamwork, and the accomplishment of pre-established goals.

COMMUNITY BUILDERS are creative at conflict management and are process- and goal-oriented. They are aware of paradox and contradiction, and they enjoy playing a variety of roles. They are objective participants and very adept at creating new knowledge and decision-making. The group member collaborating in this style is comfortable with paradox and concerned with helping others reframe their perspectives based on the purposes of the situation.

The collaboration style that we operate out of can greatly influence our effectiveness when it comes to learning. If social learning groups had mainly Co-Creators or Community Builders, we may not have much “social chicken” to contend with. However, the reality is that some of us have a collaboration style that fits more in the Conformist or Expert category. By understanding these four styles, we can identify where we typically fit and work to adjust our actions so that we improve as collaborators and contributors to the social learning environment.

Action starts with intent. Therefore, if you want to collaborate at a higher level, start by capturing a vision or mental image of what effective collaboration will look like in your social learning group. After you have a clear vision for more effective collaboration, develop strategies and plans to fulfill the vision. As you act on your new plans, assess how the others in your group are responding to your actions, and adjust your strategies, plans or actions accordingly when you stumble upon those that are inappropriate or ineffective.

As you advance your skills as a collaborator, be willing to share what you are doing with your colleagues so that they can contribute to your growth and also learn from your experiences as well. This will help everyone elevate their level of collaboration and hopefully stop the game of “social chicken.”

Written by  Randy Emelo